Random header image... Refresh for more!

Collapse of International Coffee Agreement 1989

For the first time, the global oil market faced simultaneously a policy-driven expansion in supply and an unprecedented drop in demand – the largest decline on record. Oil prices collapsed, with one measure, Brent, falling to a multi-decade low at the end of March. With estimates that oil demand could fall by 10 percent in 2020, 23 oil producers (including Russia, Saudi Arabia and the United States) agreed to a historic production cut of nearly 10 million barrels per day on April 12. In 1962, most coffee-producing countries and almost all developed coffee-consuming countries signed the International Coffee Agreement (ICA) aimed at stabilizing world coffee prices through binding export quotas. Thanks to the export quota system, it has been possible to stabilize coffee prices despite the sharp fluctuations in world coffee production. However, the pressure on the ICA increased after the advent of new coffee supplies. As the main producers could not agree on the allocation of export quotas, the coffee agreement was suspended in July 1989. After the suspension, coffee prices fell by 40%. After World War II, several commodity agreements were reached to stabilize prices, and after the surge in commodity prices in the 1970s, renewed efforts took place, usually supported by the United Nations.

Although these agreements initially stabilized markets and supported prices, rising prices led to a decline in demand over the long term and stimulated investment and innovation that brought new entrants to the market. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its agreements with other major oil producers are the only remaining efforts of this kind. It is likely that the oil deal will eventually be subject to the same shortcomings that led to the demise of previous agreements. As in all previous agreements, the organization collected and disseminated data on all coffee-related issues in order to facilitate the rapid implementation of the economic articles of the agreement and to correct any imbalances. It acted as a center of studies and economic research on the production, distribution and consumption of coffee. The statistical information obtained from the members and through the operation of the control system was computerized for quick access and analysis. A public database service, COFFEELINE, has been set up to provide a wide range of information about coffee. The Organization also used the remaining resources of the Promotion Fund established under the 1976 and 1983 Agreements to launch a promotion programme in new markets, particularly in China and Russia, which had been identified as having significant potential for increased consumption. Generic iced funding was just one of many factors influencing consumption, but was widely perceived as beneficial in both countries.

Activities included a high-profile vanessa Mae concert, the dissemination of educational materials, including a new “Coffee Story” booklet, the development of annual coffee festivals, and a program of press briefings to educate journalists about the benefits of coffee. The commodity price matching model has begun to repeat itself. High oil prices in the late 2000s brought new oil suppliers to the global oil market, including biofuel producers, The Canadian oil sands and, most importantly, U.S. shale oil. In response to increased oil supply and easing geopolitical concerns, oil prices fell in 2014. Despite market expectations, OPEC decided not to cut production in November 2014 and oil prices fell to a low of $30 a barrel in January 2016. Although low oil prices have slowed production growth outside OPEC, the U.S. shale oil industry has proven resilient due to cost reductions, efficiency gains, and innovation. At its September 2016 meeting, OPEC decided to resume production cuts by inviting non-OPEC oil producers to participate, including Russia and Mexico – as was the case after the financial crisis in East Asia. “Of course, without a market for cheap, low-quality Robusta in Vietnam, there would never have been a coffee boom. And that`s exactly what the Big Four, along with other major European roasters, have provided. They used the new steam cleaning technology to eliminate the unpleasant taste of coffee.

They introduced flavored coffee – hazelnut, Irish cream – to hide the lower taste of Robusta. The COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to an unprecedented drop in oil demand and prices, has once again triggered efforts to support the oil market. In March 2020, OPEC+, as the organization and its allies are called, failed to extend the agreed production restrictions. However, demand for oil began to experience one of the largest contractions in recent history due to the traffic freeze that followed the outbreak. The International Coffee Agreement of 1976 was negotiated in 1975 in the context of a market situation fundamentally different from that prevailing during the negotiations on the 1962 and 1968 agreements, when the supply of coffee, which went beyond consumer demand, tended to drive down prices. Until 1975, doubts about the adequacy of supply to meet demand in the immediate future resulted in a sharp rise in prices, mainly due to a severe freeze in Brazil, the world`s largest producer. These considerations prompted Members, in the negotiation of the 1976 Convention, to introduce a number of new provisions aimed at strengthening and improving the functioning of the Organization and maintaining many of the provisions that had proved effective in previous agreements. These coordinated efforts to stabilize the oil market brought some benefits to oil markets, as prices quickly reversed their price. However, it is likely that in the longer term, the recent OPEC agreement will be subject to the same shortcomings that led to the disappearance of previous agreements – substitution and efficiency gains, as well as the entry of new producers operating outside the agreement. Changes in the structure of supply and demand, which led to an increase in prices, led to the collapse of the quota system in 1973, and the 1968 agreement was extended, with all economic provisions removed.

The organization remained a center for the collection and dissemination of information and a forum for negotiating a new agreement. Although the initial drop in prices was an immediate reaction to the disintegration of the ICA, another cause contributed to subsequent crashes and persistently low coffee prices: oversupply. Development banks around the world, which have promoted export-oriented development as a means of reducing poverty, have financed production in many countries, especially Vietnam. This country increased its production by more than 1100% during the decade beginning in 1991. In addition to development organizations, multinationals have played a major role in promoting an increased supply of coffee. They are generally known as the “big four” – Nestlé, Proctor and Gamble, Kraft and Sara Lee (these are the brands these companies own). The overall objective of the agreement is to strengthen the global coffee sector and promote its sustainable expansion in a market-based environment in order to improve all participants in the sector. Other new objectives include: the implementation of these agreements helped to ensure that prices remained relatively stable between 1963 and 1972 and that production and consumption became more balanced. These first two agreements have contributed significantly to strengthening the economies of coffee-producing countries and to the development of international trade and cooperation. The International Coffee Agreement (ICA) is an international agreement on raw materials between coffee-producing and consuming countries.

It was first signed in 1962 and aims to maintain the quotas of exporting countries and to keep coffee prices on the market high and stable[1], mainly with export quotas to control the price. [2] The International Coffee Organisation, the governing body of the agreement, represents all major coffee-producing countries and most consumer countries. The investments of these companies in the cultivation of cheap coffee and the development of a process to make it drinkable are important factors in triggering the coffee crisis. An excellent and highly recommended article from Fortune magazine states: In 1989, ICO failed to reach an agreement on new export quotas, which led to the collapse of the ICA in 1983. [10] The disagreement was triggered by consumer tastes for softer, better quality coffee. [11] With the quotas maintained under the 1983 agreement, the amendment increased the value of sweeter coffee at the expense of more traditional varieties such as Robusta. [12] Brazil in particular – the world`s most powerful coffee producer – refused to lower its quotas, believing that it would reduce its market share. [11] [13] Consumers, led by the United States, demanded better quality coffee and an end to the sale of coffee to non-members at reduced rates. [14] [15] A very good overview of the coffee crisis is over at CoffeeGeek, with recommendations for consumers.

It also addresses another aspect of the crisis, namely that better quality coffee beans are becoming increasingly scarce because the small farmers who grow them cannot compete and leave the company. As the Fortune article states, the ICA was supposed to expire in 1983 on October 1, 1989, but when the Coffee Council (the supreme body of the ICO) realized that it would be impossible to conclude a new agreement before the termination date, it decided on July 4, 1989 to suspend export quotas. [14] In the absence of an enlarged agreement, producing countries have lost most of their influence on the international market. [16] The average price of the ICO indicator for the last five years before the end of the regime increased from $1.34 per pound to $0.77 per pound over the next five years. [16] The International Tin Agreement (ITA) was first negotiated in 1954 in order to keep tin prices within the desired range by managing buffer stocks […].